The Federal Law on the Protection of Children imposes obligations
The greatest value of any humansocieties are healthy children. Healthy and physically, and morally! Therefore, it is quite natural for each parent's desire to protect his child from the bad influence of low-grade films and other information "dirt". At present, the state is trying to solve this issue at the legislative level.
The Law on Protection of Children No. 436-FZ contains a listinformation that should not be available to children of a certain age. Such information includes pornographic information, obscene language, and information that may induce children to harm their health and life - the use of banned substances (all kinds of narcotic and psychotropic drugs), alcohol, tobacco products, etc. The law also prohibits giving children information that justifies violence, cruelty and all kinds of violations of the law, as well as denying family values. For these reasons, the Law on the Protection of Children from harmful information has established a specific list of harmful information, but the criteria are highly subjective. After all, even the concept of family values for each person can be individual.
The law on the protection of children from information requires the mediato put marking when displaying a particular program: for example, "+16" means that children under 16 can not watch such a film or program. But there is a logical question: will the children comply with these restrictions? After all, there was always information that was not available to children, and if the parents left the child alone at the TV, he may violate the ban.
Of course, everything depends on the upbringing of children. If the child is conscious, then he can turn off the TV, seeing that he can not watch this movie. But where did you see so obedient and conscious children? No matter how the state tries to care for the moral education of small citizens, the decisive role is played not by bans, not by educators or teachers, but only by the parents of the child and his close relatives (grandparents).
There is no doubt that the law on the protection of children is needed, soas parents are more comfortable when at the beginning of watching a particular program they already know that the child can not watch it. But the function of this law is limited only by providing certain information about the media products: for example, if the "+18" marking is affixed, the law is observed. And whether the children look at it or not, mothers and fathers of these children decide. We must approach the solution of the issue not formally, but realistically.
In this case, really preventOnly the mother and father can infiltrate harmful information into the house if, of course, they care about the upbringing of their children, and not the law on the protection of children. Now very often there is such an attitude of parents, which is expressed by the words: "Let them look, it is still on every corner". This approach is unacceptable.
No matter how good was the law on the protection of children,Only parents can save their kids from harmful information that corrupts the child's mind.